You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current state of the site already has a nice trade area which helps of course in finding people one could trade with in general. But it doesn't really help in finding a potential trade partner for a specific elephpant.
I'm envisioning a "show possible trade partners" type of link next to all i have 0 of in my herd. The following page could show all people having more than one, optionally grouping them by reverse-tradability (e.g. they look for some I have) and those I would have to persuade otherwise to part from their specific elephant :)
What do you think?
If there's an interest here, I would even consider implementing this - despite not having even looked into the code yet ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I could swear this link didn't exist before. I guess that's about as good as it gets - assuming that those where no link is shown simply don't have any possible trades...
Maybe this requires broadening the definition of "trade" though. But I'd also like to have a means of contacting / seeing, who potentially has more than one of a kind that I'm lacking - even without them looking for one I have in trade.
The current state of the site already has a nice
trade area
which helps of course in finding people one could trade with in general. But it doesn't really help in finding a potential trade partner for a specific elephpant.I'm envisioning a "show possible trade partners" type of link next to all i have 0 of in my herd. The following page could show all people having more than one, optionally grouping them by reverse-tradability (e.g. they look for some I have) and those I would have to persuade otherwise to part from their specific elephant :)
What do you think?
If there's an interest here, I would even consider implementing this - despite not having even looked into the code yet ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: