You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On some occasions, the line of the arrow indicating the reference is missing:
This might be connected to the radial range that is plotted because in the following it is fine:
In addition, if the radial range changes, e.g. by adding Mars or some other further positioned observer, the tip of the arrow changes in size. So it might be better to not define the arrow length & shape in absolute values, but rather fraction of r_max.
Hopefully this also fixes the bug of the missing arrow line.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On some occasions, the line of the arrow indicating the reference is missing:
![Solar-MACH_2020-07-11_03-00-00b](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/39489154/188877927-3ec23782-c978-4dbd-8260-6554ac07d7a0.png)
This might be connected to the radial range that is plotted because in the following it is fine:
![Solar-MACH_2020-07-11_03-00-00](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/39489154/188878007-15f444a3-9f16-4117-a418-f2f1a7785733.png)
In addition, if the radial range changes, e.g. by adding Mars or some other further positioned observer, the tip of the arrow changes in size. So it might be better to not define the arrow length & shape in absolute values, but rather fraction of r_max.
Hopefully this also fixes the bug of the missing arrow line.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: