Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/supervoxel-splits response includes duplicate entries #315

Open
stuarteberg opened this issue May 16, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

/supervoxel-splits response includes duplicate entries #315

stuarteberg opened this issue May 16, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@stuarteberg
Copy link
Member

The /supervoxel-splits endpoint includes many duplicates. Here are two examples:

In [143]: dvid_splits_df.query('mutid == 1002224862')
Out[143]:
                                uuid       mutid         old      remain       split     type
43  ef1da1a01c4941b6876ab77502843d0c  1002224862  5813075645  5813075647  5813075646  unknown
44  ef1da1a01c4941b6876ab77502843d0c  1002224862  5813075645  5813075647  5813075646  unknown

In [144]: dvid_splits_df.query('mutid == 1005819021')
Out[144]:
                                   uuid       mutid         old      remain       split     type
34651  3c281c385e064ed1b6ab93a9456a04eb  1005819021  2349519569  5901205938  5901205937  unknown
34652  3c281c385e064ed1b6ab93a9456a04eb  1005819021  2349519569  5901205938  5901205937  unknown

Some notes:

  • The /supervoxel-splits endpoint includes the results from both /split-supervoxel and /split commands, but apparently the duplicates come from ONLY /split-supervoxel commands. No /split commands resulted in a duplicate entry.

  • Out of the 13174 /supervoxel-split commands that have been issued on the production master branch**, 12861 resulted in duplicate entries. (And 313 did not.)

  • On the current production node (36b0), there have been 288 /split-supervoxel actions so far. However, NONE of these are duplicated in the /supervoxel-splits output. In other words, when I said above that 313 of the splits were NOT duplicated, most of them are from the current node. (But not all of them.)

** Not including the root node 2884, which isn't represented in our kafka logs.

@DocSavage DocSavage self-assigned this May 16, 2019
@DocSavage DocSavage added the bug label Nov 1, 2019
@DocSavage DocSavage added this to the v1.0 milestone Nov 1, 2019
@DocSavage DocSavage removed this from the v1.0 milestone May 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants