|
| 1 | +To: J3 |
| 2 | +From: Balint Aradi |
| 3 | +Subject: Protected attribute for derived type components |
| 4 | +Date: 2019-October-21 |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +Proposal for Fortran Standard: 202y (NOT 202x) |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +1. Introduction |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +The proposal is to allow specify the protected attribute for components in |
| 12 | +derived types. Example: |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | + type :: prot_t |
| 16 | + integer, allocatable, protected :: array(:) |
| 17 | + end type prot_t |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +2. Motivation |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +Data hiding using derived types with private components allows programmer to |
| 23 | +provide robust types, where internals can only be changed in controlled |
| 24 | +fashion. The usual implementation is to provide setter and getter routines for |
| 25 | +writing and reading components. Both operations involve copying the passed data, |
| 26 | +which can be inefficient when storing large arrays in the derived type |
| 27 | +instance. While in the setter routine the copying serves robustness by |
| 28 | +"disentangling" the data stored in the derived type from the original data, the |
| 29 | +getter routine and the connected copy operation might be superfluous, when the |
| 30 | +consumer only wants to read but not modify the data stored in the derived type |
| 31 | +intance. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +By allowing for a direct read-only access, one could enhance efficiency in those |
| 34 | +cases without sacrificing the consistency of the encapsulated data. Direct |
| 35 | +access is possible with current Fortran already, but only if the respective |
| 36 | +derived type component is public. This would jeopardize data consistency, |
| 37 | +though, as a consumer could change the respective component arbitrarily, without |
| 38 | +using the provided setter routine. |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +This proposal suggests to allow the "protected" attribute already used for |
| 41 | +module variables being used for derived type components as well. It would also |
| 42 | +remedy the asymmetry between the attributes "private"/"public" and the attribute |
| 43 | +"protected", as the former two can be applied to both, module variables and |
| 44 | +derived type components, while the latter only for module variables so far. |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +3. Use Cases |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +Derived types storing large amount of data could enable read-only access to |
| 50 | +components without the necessity of a getter routine and the connected copy |
| 51 | +operation: |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | + module data_m |
| 54 | + implicit none |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | + type :: prot_t |
| 57 | + ! Large array component |
| 58 | + integer, allocatable, protected :: array(:) |
| 59 | + contains |
| 60 | + procedure :: set |
| 61 | + end type prot_t |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | + contains |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | + subroutine set(this, array) |
| 66 | + type(prot_t), intent(out) :: this |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | + this%array = array |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + end subroutine set |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | + end module data_m |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + program use_data |
| 77 | + use data_m |
| 78 | + implicit none |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | + type(prot_t) :: storage |
| 81 | + integer, allocatable :: large_array(:) |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | + ! Filling up and allocating the large array |
| 84 | + ! ... |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | + ! Storing the large array in the derived type instance |
| 87 | + call storage%set(large_array) |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | + ! Accessing large array stored in the derived type directly |
| 90 | + ! No getter routine and no copy necessary |
| 91 | + ! Dummy argument of the called routine must be intent(in) |
| 92 | + call some_routine_processing_but_not_changing_the_array(storage%array) |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | + ! Inconsistent change, consumer is supposed to call set() to change |
| 95 | + ! encapsulated data. |
| 96 | + ! Uncommenting the next line should trigger a compiler error. |
| 97 | + !storage%array(1) = -1 |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + end program use_data |
0 commit comments