You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
For regions with scattered glaciers especially, I believe the performance could be increased by excluding data outside of glacierized areas, or in general, outside of the region of interest.
This was not implemented because excluding l2 point data can be costly for complex polygons. Maybe a pragmatic way would be to add an option to exclude points prior to processing. The complexity could maybe be reduce by using convex hulls, I believe.
Maybe there are even better ways?
Describe the solution you'd like
A better performing l2 to l3 algorithm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
For regions with scattered glaciers especially, I believe the performance could be increased by excluding data outside of glacierized areas, or in general, outside of the region of interest.
This was not implemented because excluding l2 point data can be costly for complex polygons. Maybe a pragmatic way would be to add an option to exclude points prior to processing. The complexity could maybe be reduce by using convex hulls, I believe.
Maybe there are even better ways?
Describe the solution you'd like
A better performing l2 to l3 algorithm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: