Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add option to clip data to area of interest in l2 to l3 processing #24

Open
j-haacker opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@j-haacker
Copy link
Owner

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
For regions with scattered glaciers especially, I believe the performance could be increased by excluding data outside of glacierized areas, or in general, outside of the region of interest.

This was not implemented because excluding l2 point data can be costly for complex polygons. Maybe a pragmatic way would be to add an option to exclude points prior to processing. The complexity could maybe be reduce by using convex hulls, I believe.

Maybe there are even better ways?

Describe the solution you'd like
A better performing l2 to l3 algorithm.

@j-haacker j-haacker added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant