You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Found mc-router when I was searching for a way to force the container to a subnet and it works great.
So now I'm getting into stacks with Portainer and have set up two different MC-servers. Also works great.
However, seems like the RCON-port is'nt forwarded through the mc-router. I've even tried exposing the ports as usal (different ports though since the bridge is same), but it doen't even work with that.
Is there a magic --mapping command to map those ports same as with the mc-ports?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seems it's not working on it's own either? Meaning 25565 goes through router to subdomain and the two RCON (26675 & another) directly to IP. Shouldn't it work?
Feature request for whom? It's an established protocol.
Seems it's not working on it's own either? Meaning 25565 goes through router to subdomain and the two RCON (26675 & another) directly to IP. Shouldn't it work?
Do you mean with port mapping each container to a different port? That should work.
Found mc-router when I was searching for a way to force the container to a subnet and it works great.
So now I'm getting into stacks with Portainer and have set up two different MC-servers. Also works great.
However, seems like the RCON-port is'nt forwarded through the mc-router. I've even tried exposing the ports as usal (different ports though since the bridge is same), but it doen't even work with that.
Is there a magic --mapping command to map those ports same as with the mc-ports?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: