Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add linting of docs to GitHub workflow #722

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add linting of docs to GitHub workflow #722

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

devtobi
Copy link
Member

@devtobi devtobi commented Jan 17, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Description

  • Added docs npm project to build workflow

Reference
Issues #721

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration to include documentation application path in build process
    • Minor refinements to Docker image build steps in continuous integration workflow

@devtobi devtobi requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2025 12:47
@devtobi devtobi linked an issue Jan 17, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
[Maintenance] Add checking of docs to pipeline #721
Open
2 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file for Maven and Node.js builds. The primary change involves expanding the job matrix to include a new application path for documentation (docs), alongside existing application paths. This update enhances the workflow's flexibility by enabling build processes for the documentation component. The Docker image building step has also been slightly reorganized to maintain consistent formatting while preserving the existing logic for determining the registry username.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/maven-node-build.yaml Added docs to job matrix
Reorganized Docker image build step formatting

Poem

🐰 A workflow dance, a matrix so bright,
Docs now join the build with might!
GitHub Actions spinning free,
Configurations dancing with glee
Rabbit's code leaps with pure delight! 🚀

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d14b4c2 and ab92ac1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/maven-node-build.yaml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build (refarch-backend)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/maven-node-build.yaml (2)

42-42: LGTM!

The registry-username configuration maintains the same functionality while improving formatting consistency.

22-22: Verify the docs project structure.

The addition of docs to the build matrix aligns with the PR objective. However, let's verify the project structure to ensure it can be built correctly.

✅ Verification successful

✓ Valid docs project structure confirmed

The docs directory contains a properly configured package.json with the required build script and additional development utilities (VitePress, Prettier, markdownlint). The matrix configuration is appropriate for this setup.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the docs project structure and build files

# Check if docs directory exists
if [ -d "docs" ]; then
  echo "✓ docs directory exists"
  
  # Check for package.json or pom.xml
  if [ -f "docs/package.json" ]; then
    echo "✓ package.json found"
    cat docs/package.json | jq '.scripts'
  elif [ -f "docs/pom.xml" ]; then
    echo "✓ pom.xml found"
  else
    echo "⚠ No build file (package.json or pom.xml) found in docs directory"
  fi
else
  echo "⚠ docs directory not found"
fi

Length of output: 355

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Type: Maintenance The issue contains maintenance work. label Jan 17, 2025
@devtobi devtobi changed the title Update maven-node-build.yaml Add linting of docs to GitHub workflow Jan 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Type: Maintenance The issue contains maintenance work.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Maintenance] Add checking of docs to pipeline
1 participant
@devtobi