Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Physical quantum resource estimates #45

Closed
max-radin opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Physical quantum resource estimates #45

max-radin opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@max-radin
Copy link
Contributor

In order to be able to account for runtime in performance analysis of QPE, we need to estimate it and include it in solution JSON files. To address this we should update our QPE resource estimation script to estimate runtimes for some reasonable hardware architecture.

Note that originally we were planning to use benchq's footprint analysis capabilities. However given that benchq is not compatible with the versions of pyliqtr that have double factorization, we could consider using another tool such as one of qualtran's physical cost models.

@max-radin max-radin added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 5, 2024
@max-radin max-radin self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
@max-radin
Copy link
Contributor Author

max-radin commented Dec 6, 2024

Branch physical-resource-estimates updates the LRE script to include physical estimates using qualtran. However it's not very useful at the moment because even for planted solution 1 (14 orbitals), it fails to find factories that satisfy the required success rate.

@max-radin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Addressed by #66.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant