Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Sphinx for Onion Routing #1604

Open
haraldh opened this issue Jul 18, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Consider Sphinx for Onion Routing #1604

haraldh opened this issue Jul 18, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@haraldh
Copy link

haraldh commented Jul 18, 2016

Whitepaper: http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/DBLP:conf/sp/DanezisG09.pdf

Presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34TKXELJa2c

Code: https://github.com/DonnchaC/sphinx

@GrayHatter
Copy link
Collaborator

Okay, but why is it better? Before I read the whitepaper, I want to know what I'm looking for?

@haraldh
Copy link
Author

haraldh commented Jul 19, 2016

Comparison to TOR:
Short paper: http://www.cypherpunks.ca/~iang/pubs/SphinxOR.pdf
Longer paper: http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2009/cacr2009-33.pdf

TLDR:
"Our new circuit constructions are also secure in the universal composability framework, a property that was missing from the original constructions. "
"Importantly, the circuit construction messages for these new protocols are significantly smaller than those in the original protocol and there is no addition to a user’s computational cost. "
"Therefore, our Sphinx-based design achieves the same security guarantees with much smaller messages."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants