You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In this example, it looks like when there is only one conductivity value surrounded by missing values within the threshold window, the test flags the one valid conductivity value.
We think we have a modification to qartod.py that checks to make sure there are at least 3 valid data points in the test window:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lgarzio
changed the title
flat_line_test doesn't work with a lot of missing values
flat_line_test doesn't work with a lot of missing values (priority: low)
Sep 28, 2021
lgarzio
changed the title
flat_line_test doesn't work with a lot of missing values (priority: low)
flat_line_test doesn't work when threshold window contains mostly missing values (priority: low)
Sep 28, 2021
lgarzio
changed the title
flat_line_test doesn't work when threshold window contains mostly missing values (priority: low)
flat_line_test doesn't work when threshold window mostly contains missing values (priority: low)
Sep 28, 2021
The flat_line_test doesn't appear to work in datasets with lots of missing values. ioos_qc version 2.0.1
Example netcdf file here
Example configuration file:
test_flatline.txt
In this example, it looks like when there is only one conductivity value surrounded by missing values within the threshold window, the test flags the one valid conductivity value.
We think we have a modification to qartod.py that checks to make sure there are at least 3 valid data points in the test window:
add line 663:
modify line 665 (now 666):
When these lines are added/modified in qartod.py, the result for this example becomes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: