Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

submit a pyobis paper to JOSS #132

Open
MathewBiddle opened this issue May 5, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

submit a pyobis paper to JOSS #132

MathewBiddle opened this issue May 5, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@MathewBiddle
Copy link
Collaborator

MathewBiddle commented May 5, 2023

I think we talked about this during GSoC last year. I think it would be great to write up a small paper on the pyobis package and submit it to the Journal of Open Source Science: https://joss.theoj.org/

@ayushanand18 has already compiled a good list of examples and robust documentation. I don't think the lift would be too much, plus you get a publication!

I would be willing to help out, if it's something folks want to consider.

@ocefpaf
Copy link
Collaborator

ocefpaf commented May 5, 2023

JOSS is making their requirements a bit tighter and API wrappers not necessarily make the cut. Just keep that in mind and, maybe, we can wait to add more functionality to pyobis before trying submitting it to JOSS.

@ayushanand18
Copy link
Collaborator

I think if not JOSS then we can try for other journals which especially look out for packages that help out researchers. One outcome of a possible publication would be exposing this package it to the wider research community.

@ocefpaf
Copy link
Collaborator

ocefpaf commented May 5, 2023

It may be worth a try though. I just wanted to give you all the heads up b/c they did reject a few similar projects in the past. See https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html?#what-we-mean-by-research-software

In a way pyobis could fall under extracts knowledge from large data sets.

@ayushanand18
Copy link
Collaborator

I have setup the working draft PR #133. I would request @MathewBiddle @ocefpaf and @7yl4r to please update the affiliations and any more details you would like to add in the paper/paper.md file. I'm not sure what sections should we include apart from the default ones. Thanks!

@ayushanand18
Copy link
Collaborator

As @ocefpaf suggested, and I agree too, should we submit to PyOpenSci first and then to JOSS because they "fast-track" such applications?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants