You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
for functions like ard_regression(), ard_ttest(), etc., should we include an argument to return the ARD with a row for the model object.
PRO: for regression models, users have access to the object needed to make additional calculations as needed.
an aside, need to consider how we can add additional results to the regression modeling object. Thee broom::glance() is a simple default (and easy to make extendable by users). Even if we did add this, how can we distinguish these results from other regression model objects that may appear in the same stacked ARD.
CON: a modelling object is not something that is generic/readable by other languages, so we need a direct use case before adding it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature description
for functions like
ard_regression()
,ard_ttest()
, etc., should we include an argument to return the ARD with a row for the model object.broom::glance()
is a simple default (and easy to make extendable by users). Even if we did add this, how can we distinguish these results from other regression model objects that may appear in the same stacked ARD.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: