-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Invite multiple people through e-groups #402
Comments
There's the usual privacy issue that comes with allowing someone to expand a large group whose members the person may not be able to see otherwise. A good alternative is to not add individual participants via group but just share the generic response link with the group e.g. via email... |
Hey @ThiefMaster - could this be done without visibly expanding / exposing the list members? For other purposes (e.g. the "follow-up enhancement suggestion" in #472 ) it might still be worthwhile to make the recipients info available to Newdle. And even without exposing the members, scheduling could be helped by aggregated availability info, indicating times where 100% of the members are available. And yes, there ought to be a limit to the number of members when determining the availability... (cernbox-users!) |
I agree that this would be super useful, and I don't think that the privacy issues are impossible to overcome. Event scheduling in Outlook 365 seems to be using the aggregate approach that @Axel-Naumann mentions when inviting an e-group, so there is precedent. |
Manually adding multiple participants can be arduous, especially for a group activity that could generally be solved by inviting all the participants of an e-group. This issue suggests the implementation of multipass (or local) group based participants.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: