You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To test the demo automatically, e.g. on in-toto update, we extract and run the cli snippets in README.md and check the output with run_demo_md.py.
run_demo.py, on the other hand, was meant to verbosely walk through the demo, e.g. in a presentation (and to clean up the demo workbench).
However, run_demo.py must be synced with README manually, which is easily missed, because the script is not tested automatically.
I assume that the demo has become less relevant in presentations, but mostly used as in-toto getting started, for which the tested README should be sufficient.
Shall we just remove run_demo.py? Otherwise I recommend to also test it automatically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FYI we do personally find run_demo.py helpful as we use this project in a supply chain course and some of my students are not very technical and benefit from just running this script.
To test the demo automatically, e.g. on in-toto update, we extract and run the cli snippets in README.md and check the output with
run_demo_md.py
.run_demo.py
, on the other hand, was meant to verbosely walk through the demo, e.g. in a presentation (and to clean up the demo workbench).However,
run_demo.py
must be synced with README manually, which is easily missed, because the script is not tested automatically.I assume that the demo has become less relevant in presentations, but mostly used as in-toto getting started, for which the tested README should be sufficient.
Shall we just remove
run_demo.py
? Otherwise I recommend to also test it automatically.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: