Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review how quantiles are scanned #17

Open
perrette opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Review how quantiles are scanned #17

perrette opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
preprocessing Processing data to feed into rime(X) rimeX

Comments

@perrette
Copy link
Collaborator

perrette commented Jun 6, 2024

Currently the fitting is done by searching for specific variable names in rimeX.records.fit_records (commit 33b0aa0)

This was a quick hack, but clearly it should be done in a more general manner, especially for the preferred case when a quantile or percentile column is present in the data. In the latter case, the variable name need to be stripped from the percentile mention before grouping. A user-define parameter may also indicate a custom mapping.

This is related and a pre-requisite to solving issue #16.

@perrette perrette added the rimeX label Jun 6, 2024
@perrette perrette added the preprocessing Processing data to feed into rime(X) label Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
preprocessing Processing data to feed into rime(X) rimeX
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant