You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the software performs AM modulation with a 1kHz carrier tone to allow the electrodes' signals through the high-pass filter on the device's audio jack.
Would adding less than a 1 kHz carrier tone require less power, and distort the signal less?
We don't think so: we think anything less than 650 Hz would not be physiologically meaningful; a higher frequency carrier signal samples the neural signal more finely. (The Nyquist rate puts a lower bound on the sample rate.)
You can experiment by changing the carrier signal in software.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the software performs AM modulation with a 1kHz carrier tone to allow the electrodes' signals through the high-pass filter on the device's audio jack.
Would adding less than a 1 kHz carrier tone require less power, and distort the signal less?
We don't think so: we think anything less than 650 Hz would not be physiologically meaningful; a higher frequency carrier signal samples the neural signal more finely. (The Nyquist rate puts a lower bound on the sample rate.)
You can experiment by changing the carrier signal in software.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: