Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving crossings of inter-cluster edges #22

Open
ugurdogrusoz opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Improving crossings of inter-cluster edges #22

ugurdogrusoz opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@ugurdogrusoz
Copy link
Contributor

One particular improvement here might be using the cosep algorithm (instead of cose) for laying out the quotient graph. Here we need to carefully position circle nodes and set the port constraints accordingly though. Let's discuss.

@ugurdogrusoz ugurdogrusoz added the enhancement Enhancement to existing feature label Mar 23, 2021
herencalik added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2021
@ugurdogrusoz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's compare this version of CoSEP with the previous one using the provided graphs (privately) on the Google drive folder.

@herencalik
Copy link
Contributor

  • We integrated CoSEP algorithm instead of CoSE for laying out the quotient graph.
  • Tested and compared both algorithms in two ways:
    1. Edge-Edge crossings in just after the quotient graph layout and
    2. Edge-Edge crossings in the final layout.
  • CoSEP algorithm gives better results in the first case, whereas CoSE generally outperforms in the second case.
    The reason for this might be that we give many constraints while laying out the quotient graph and CoSEP lays the graph out trying to satisfy all the constraints, which produces a better layout in the quotient layout step but removes the freedom and randomness that might be useful in further steps. Also, CoSEP is not very good at the case where all the edges have absolute port constraints in both sides. If that is improved, CiSE case might also be reconsidered.

@ugurdogrusoz
Copy link
Contributor Author

We give up on this idea (at least for now).

@ugurdogrusoz ugurdogrusoz added wontfix This will not be worked on and removed enhancement Enhancement to existing feature labels Oct 20, 2021
@ugurdogrusoz ugurdogrusoz removed their assignment Oct 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants