Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
You have a fault in your code. MSPv2 works fine for compliant implementations. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I confirm that MSPv2 is working like expected |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
As can numerous public examples, inter alia: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thanks for checking. Wanted to mainly make sure I wasn't missing something
obvious.
Same function call to send < 255 functions but build v2 byte array in
another method.
Stumped as to why it isn't responding. Get back 0 bytes for the read.
…On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, 3:53 PM Jonathan Hudson ***@***.***> wrote:
As can numerous public examples, inter alia:
- mwptools <https://github.com/stronnag/mwptools>
- bbl2kml <https://github.com/stronnag/bbl2kml>
- inav-follow-me <https://github.com/stronnag/inav-follow-me>
- impload <https://github.com/stronnag/impload>
- msp-set-rx <https://github.com/stronnag/msp_set_rx>
- msp-rs <https://github.com/stronnag/msp-rs>
- msp-go <https://github.com/stronnag/msp-go>
- INAV Configurator <https://github.com/iNavFlight/inav-configurator>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8971 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA653HQDYCIGWQL6RMZLZNLXAWZDLANCNFSM6AAAAAAW2SUTOY>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Don't recall. No longer working on that project.
…On Thu, Dec 5, 2024, 4:32 AM netIOTil ***@***.***> wrote:
did you mange to a get response?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8971 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA653HWVM3QZLJXY6WD3TMD2EAMSNAVCNFSM6AAAAABTCASV56VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNBXGA4DSOI>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In the process of implementing java based control software that would run on google coral/jetson nano/pi attached to drone and send MSP commands to FC for autonomous flight. Had no problem implementing code for function id < 255 for the V1 messages.
Was testing MSPV2_INAV_ANALOG and do not get a response back from FC.
I have verified that I am generating the correct byte array for the message, in particular the checksum. Used the "Hello World" message at https://github.com/iNavFlight/inav/wiki/MSP-V2 to verify correctness.
For MSPV2_INAV_ANALOG would send the following.
bytearray($X<\x00\x02\x20\x00\x00\xB8)
Thought it might require longer time for response if sampling X number of analog ports but that doesn't seem to be the issue.
Then tested a couple other V2 commands and no response.
Assuming I should be requesting data as the master.
Am I missing anything obvious?
Running V6 and INAV Config works as expected.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions