You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current choices of GPS dynamic model does not include the middle/ "normal" option that would be AIR_2G.
Allowed values today: PEDESTRIAN, AIR_1G, AIR_4G Default AIR_1G
Desired Behavior
AIR_2G to be included in allowed values - since uBlox supports it.
Might benefit user/dev tuning of position estimator engine to increase accuracy / reduce lag.
Suggested Solution
Add GPS dynamic model AIR_2G as a valid option.
Who does this impact? Who is this for?
It´s for anyone attempting to tune the position estimator to balance accuracy / lag.
Current choices might represent too cold or too hot. Maybe AIR_2g could represent sweet spot.
Additional context
Copy paste from UBLOX:
Airborne <1g Used for applications with a higher dynamic range and greater vertical
acceleration than a passenger car. No 2D position fixes supported.
Airborne <2g Recommended for typical airborne environments. No 2D position fixes
supported.
Airborne <4g Only recommended for extremely dynamic environments. No 2D position fixes
supported.
This discussion was converted from issue #6343 on December 15, 2020 07:47.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Current Behavior
Current choices of GPS dynamic model does not include the middle/ "normal" option that would be AIR_2G.
Allowed values today: PEDESTRIAN, AIR_1G, AIR_4G Default AIR_1G
Desired Behavior
AIR_2G to be included in allowed values - since uBlox supports it.
Might benefit user/dev tuning of position estimator engine to increase accuracy / reduce lag.
Suggested Solution
Add GPS dynamic model AIR_2G as a valid option.
Who does this impact? Who is this for?
It´s for anyone attempting to tune the position estimator to balance accuracy / lag.
Current choices might represent too cold or too hot. Maybe AIR_2g could represent sweet spot.
Additional context
Copy paste from UBLOX:
UBLOX data sheet:
https://www.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/products/documents/u-blox8-M8_ReceiverDescrProtSpec_%28UBX-13003221%29.pdf
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions