You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What do you think would be the best way to handle the transmission when the attenuator is in? Currently we have a per detector file stix_transmission_highres_20210303.csv which does not include attenuation and a component file which includes the transmission through the attenuator stix_transmission_by_component_highres_20210303.csv. The information here can be combined during processing when the attenuator is in but this might not be the cleanest way to handle it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What do you think would be the best way to handle the transmission when the attenuator is in? Currently we have a per detector file stix_transmission_highres_20210303.csv which does not include attenuation and a component file which includes the transmission through the attenuator stix_transmission_by_component_highres_20210303.csv. The information here can be combined during processing when the attenuator is in but this might not be the cleanest way to handle it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: