Full Lambda Syntax without =

[msadeqhe]

Currently Cpp2 has this terser lambda syntax:

: (x) x + 1

Would it be possible to also drop = from full lambda syntax?

: (x: i32) -> i32 { return x + 1; }

: (x: i32) { print(x); }

Consequently function declaration syntax would be changed too:

fnc1: (x: i32) -> i32
{
    return x + 1;
}

fnc2: (x: i32)
{
    print(x);
}

Literally for consistency, it leads to dropping = from all other declarations too:

spc1: namespace
{
    cls1: type
    {
        fld1: i32 = 10;
    }
}

So all declarations would be less divergent from Cpp1 as discussed in #742.

[SebastianTroy]

Also using = in namespaces declarations makes it feel like a subsequent declaration should replace the name space content, rather than extend it. On 31 October 2023 08:23:16 Sadeq ***@***.***> wrote: Currently Cpp2 has this terser lambda syntax: : (x) x + 1 Would it be possible to also drop = from full lambda syntax? : (x: i32) -> i32 { return x + 1; } Consequently function declaration syntax would be changed too: fnc1: (x: i32) -> i32 { return x + 1; } Literally for consistency, it leads to dropping = from all other declarations too: spc1: namespace { cls1: type { fld1: i32 = 10; } } So all declarations would be less divergence from Cpp1 as discussed in #742<#742>. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#793>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALUZQOS6AT7PXFTUEMPHN3YCCYPFAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6XIZCDOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ERDJONRXK43TNFXW4OZVG44TMOBYHE>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[JohelEGP]

That's why I opened #634.