You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Look into using one of the newer pieces of swift collections, specifically the pending-1.1-release HashTreeCollections, which provides an optimized append-only structure that sounds like it would be lovely for the backing store of operations. (right now, it's just using Set<> which, while functional, might not provide the best operations for scaled up sets of data.
To verify the performance aspects, I think I'd want to bolster the benchmarks applied here, and seriously consider some of the classic CRDT benchmark structures, such as the string-sequence one that Martin Kleppmann (encoded at https://github.com/automerge/automerge-perf)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Look into using one of the newer pieces of swift collections, specifically the pending-1.1-release HashTreeCollections, which provides an optimized append-only structure that sounds like it would be lovely for the backing store of operations. (right now, it's just using
Set<>
which, while functional, might not provide the best operations for scaled up sets of data.To verify the performance aspects, I think I'd want to bolster the benchmarks applied here, and seriously consider some of the classic CRDT benchmark structures, such as the string-sequence one that Martin Kleppmann (encoded at https://github.com/automerge/automerge-perf)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: