You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current comments/documentation on the internal representation of IntSet are poorly/confusingly phrased. This should be fixed to ease introducing future developers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thoughts on this being a README in the Data/IntMap/ directory (in addition to better comments in code)? That may make it easier to format and add graphics to help with the explanation. I can put something together since I've been digging around in the code a little bit.
A README sounds okay, but there will need to be a strongly worded note in
the code reminding people to update it whenever the structure or invariants
change. Also, I think improving the comments remains a priority regardless.
On Dec 22, 2017 1:15 PM, "Matt Renaud" ***@***.***> wrote:
Thoughts on this being a README in the Data/IntMap/ directory (in addition
to better comments in code)? That may make it easier to format and add
graphics to help with the explanation. I can put something together since
I've been digging around in the code a little bit.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#404 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABzi_cLETB4T7gap2ksyhI4ACL14E_1Nks5tC_HcgaJpZM4L__QD>
.
The current comments/documentation on the internal representation of
IntSet
are poorly/confusingly phrased. This should be fixed to ease introducing future developers.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: