Replies: 2 comments
-
Ping, @grindsa |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
hi, sorry for letting you waiting. The idea of having additional protocol support sounds really interesting but I fear that I do not have the bandwidth to work on it. However patches are welcome at any time... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
As the back end library grows with ever more pluggable back ends, I think it's becoming more desirable to also have the fronts pluggable.
My particular use case involves a client software that only supports the MS
certsrv
"protocol", but I could also see SCEP being fairly straight forward to implement.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions