-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
run seedDb script not where documentation implies #91
Comments
@kimcs I have been able to use the seedDb. Infact, I have used this starter as a way for me to get my own react app become a grand stack. In the README, this is marked as optional step. Did you have issues running seedDB? What is the error you see? Can you help explain more on what happens when you run seedDB. Is your Graphql docker container up? |
I am also facing the issue with I have followed the GrandStack starter project to create my first GrandStack application. I have created the Neo4J sandbox with the blank database and added the respective information into the When I try to run the command
I have verified that the mutations that I am getting from the method I am unable to find any solution for the same. Is anyone facing similar issue and found any solution? |
@kimcs Thanks for checking out the template, going to break this down into separate issues, because these seem to be separate items. The one I would like to address is the one in the title.
You are right about that, built a script connector and updated the documentation to reflect updates here: #104 I broke the docker issue out: |
@KavitaKirdkude you might be running into a seperate issue. |
Going to close this issue withe docs update branch and moving other non-related issues |
I was finally able to run the command
npm run seedDb
after i discovered that I needed to be in theapi
subfolder for this to work. This is not reflected in the documentation.Also the seedDb command for docker at the bottom of the README does not work either, perhaps this is a similar issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: