Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Add Custom CA for TLS intercepting proxy (mitm Proxy) #15866

Open
git001 opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Feature Request: Add Custom CA for TLS intercepting proxy (mitm Proxy) #15866

git001 opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
type/feature Something new we should do

Comments

@git001
Copy link

git001 commented Jan 21, 2025

As I'm not sure if the loki-Team see this as a bug or feature I think a Feature Request is a good start point for a discussion.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

There are some Setups out there which intercepts the https connection via a HTTP-Proxy and re-encrypt the traffic.
It would be nice to add an option to add a Trusted-CA Bundle from a file location or ENV Var.
As I have seen that the current proxy library have not such a feature have I add a Issue Feature Request: Add Custom CA for TLS intercepting proxy (mitm Proxy)

This is the code to which I refer to.

Proxy: ieproxy.GetProxyFunc(),

Describe the solution you'd like
We would like to be able to add a file location or a ENV Var to the Deployment/Pod/Setup where a custom Trusted CA is located so that loki components can use this CA Bundle to interact with a Proxy.

I see there some possible solutions.

Describe alternatives you've considered
We have now created a direct connection for the azure blob storage, because of that is the ingester now able to write logs to azure blob storage.

@JStickler JStickler added the type/feature Something new we should do label Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/feature Something new we should do
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants