-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 327
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pretrained densenet169 weights #40
Comments
I think you should be able to use any of the PyTorch pretrained DenseNets:
Those urls should have the weights. Let me know if this works! |
Thanks for your reply! |
Did you try the ones here: https://github.com/mingminzhen/densenet-efficient-model |
Yes, but it is based on the pretrained memory efficient torch model(232,264): |
Try converting the pytorch model then. All you have to do is change the name of the keys in the state duct in the link that I supplied. That’s how we created the other efficient densenets.
Best,
Geoff
…On May 23, 2018, 10:55 PM -0400, Kexiii ***@***.***>, wrote:
Yes, but it is based on the pretrained memory efficient torch model(232,264):
https://github.com/liuzhuang13/DenseNet
In the tech report, they didn't provide efficient densenet169 pretrained torch model that I want
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Thanks for your advice, |
Hi, |
Yup. Imagenet. |
Hi, thanks for your great work!
I'm working on densenet169 these days, do you know where I can find the ImageNet pretrained weights for this efficient implementation? Or do you have any example code to show how to convert the other implementation's pretrained model to this one?
I do have noticed this #13 , but it seems @ZhengRui didn't provide any example code, and I don't know where to start..
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: