Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added an Atom.xml file #35

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2012
Merged

Added an Atom.xml file #35

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2012

Conversation

goozbach
Copy link
Member

Works in google reader and w3c validator.

Fixes #14

shalkie added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2012
@shalkie shalkie merged commit a6940c0 into gooseproject:master Feb 27, 2012
@shalkie
Copy link
Member

shalkie commented Feb 27, 2012

Looks good. Is the expectation that site.com/atom.xml is a standard or do we need an RSS/Atom link?

@goozbach
Copy link
Member Author

I had pushed this just the ATOM file to test. Yes we do need an atom link. I'll add that.

@shalkie
Copy link
Member

shalkie commented Feb 27, 2012

On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 06:56 -0800, Derek Carter wrote:

I had pushed this just the ATOM file to test. Yes we do need an atom link. I'll add that.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#35 (comment)

Oh I see. Along those same lines I pushed through a config change to the
planet that was suppose to pull in the commits of the main repo.

  1. It's broken. :-(

  2. I wonder how much traffic that is going to result in.

I really like the idea that people joining the project get posted to the
planet. However it occurred to me that there was the chance for large
amounts of commits that aren't necessarily related to people joining the
project.

  • Mike

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Repo needs a Readme.
2 participants