You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at existing implementations, they have lines like these which return values only for the "real" start/stop times, which might significantly reduce the memory used for series with high "churn".
However, functions like transformNull only seem to act on the set of values included, though theoretically the RequestStart/RequestStop Time should also be filled with NaN.
So my question is: Is this a bug in transformNull or should the zipper be providing "dense" values?
backend software and config
Custom in-house integration
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem description
Looking at existing implementations, they have lines like these which return values only for the "real" start/stop times, which might significantly reduce the memory used for series with high "churn".
However, functions like transformNull only seem to act on the set of values included, though theoretically the RequestStart/RequestStop Time should also be filled with NaN.
So my question is: Is this a bug in transformNull or should the zipper be providing "dense" values?
backend software and config
Custom in-house integration
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: