Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

'act' #949

Closed
jmccrae opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #965
Closed

'act' #949

jmccrae opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #965
Labels
definition A definition needs to be updated synset duplicate A synset has been claimed as a duplicate
Milestone

Comments

@jmccrae
Copy link
Member

jmccrae commented Jun 27, 2023

Synsets
oewn-02424173-v (Interlingual Index: i33830)
(v) act

be engaged in an activity, often for no particular purpose other than pleasure

and

oewn-02372362-v (Interlingual Index: i33603)
(v) act, move

perform an action, or work out or perform (an action) “think before you act” “We must move quickly” “The governor should act on the new energy bill” “The nanny acted quickly by grabbing the toddler and covering him with a wet towel”

Motivation
I don't think the first sense is very distinct. Other dictionaries don't seem to distinguish 'act' by it being 'for no particular purpose'. I think we can merge this into the general idea of 'acting'

@jmccrae jmccrae added synset duplicate A synset has been claimed as a duplicate definition A definition needs to be updated labels Jun 27, 2023
@jmccrae jmccrae added this to the 2023 Release milestone Jun 29, 2023
@arademaker
Copy link
Member

one sense is strict intransitive. The other sense can be intransitive, transitive with/without PP attached.

@jmccrae
Copy link
Member Author

jmccrae commented Aug 22, 2023

The second sense can't actually be transitive, it can be intransitive with an animate or an inanimate subject.

It is clear that the first sense is narrower, i.e., limited to animate subjects and with the differentia in the definition of 'for no particular purpose'. Following the discussions in #243 (on sense distinctions) and #237 (on avoiding hyponyms with the same lemma), I think it is better to merge these senses.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
definition A definition needs to be updated synset duplicate A synset has been claimed as a duplicate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants