-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Match WordNet and dbnary? #506
Comments
What about https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/WordNet_ID? We may need to investigate how to connect wordnet and wikidata |
@arademaker, thank you very much for your suggestion and the link. |
@arademaker, links from Wikidata are only possible when the item exists in WordNet. Wikidata seems to wait for the integration of Wiktionary. By matching wiktionary (dbnary) entries with WordNet we could identify missing lemmas (including definitions!). |
Sure, I have some plans to link to Wikidata. Wiktionary is a bit harder but also something we will look into at some point. |
As an example, here is a word sense from dbnary: |
FWIW, here are two other screenshots from the VocBench3 UI. The current project (Open German WordNet) shows a lexical sense of the German lemma "Regal" ("shelf"@en, "rack"@en) that is linked to a dbnary lexical sense as A click on the URL shows the lexical sense from dbnary and its definition: |
IMO en.wiktionary.org is an interesting resource for senses and definitions.
Since both resources are available in RDF comparing the structure of dbnary and WordNet is easy, thanks to the OntoLex-Lemon lexicon model and the W3C community group that created it.
My thanks to https://github.com/excalidraw/excalidraw. Without this great tool I could not have written this message.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: