You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Gianluca, thanks for maintaining this project!
I want to add box contraints for x and u in a ocp-qp problem, and the dim of state(x) and input(u) is 6 and 2 in my problem.
I set idxbx = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, idxbu = {0, 1}, and set "lbx, ubx, lbu, ubu" with reasonable size and value, the result is that: all of state(x) variable is correctly limited by lbx/ubx, and the first dimension of u is correctly limited by lbu/ubu, but the second dimension of u is not bounded, it violated the constraints we set.
So, is there some problems with my usage? or can you provide a u box constraint example for me? thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If the solver did however converge, then there should be some issue somewhere else.
In this case, if you can share a stand-alone C testing script reproducing the issue, I can have a look into it.
Hi Gianluca, thanks for maintaining this project!
I want to add box contraints for x and u in a ocp-qp problem, and the dim of state(x) and input(u) is 6 and 2 in my problem.
I set idxbx = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, idxbu = {0, 1}, and set "lbx, ubx, lbu, ubu" with reasonable size and value, the result is that: all of state(x) variable is correctly limited by lbx/ubx, and the first dimension of u is correctly limited by lbu/ubu, but the second dimension of u is not bounded, it violated the constraints we set.
So, is there some problems with my usage? or can you provide a u box constraint example for me? thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: