You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I’m evaluating Convex to migrate a Firebase app. IMHO, unless your main target are developers, Google OAuth is much more useful to users than the already well documented GitHub OAuth.
The official Google OAuth example does not provide details about the actual Google profile fields we can get. To make it work, I had to go to Google OAuth docs to select the sub field as my ID. I also added the email_verified field that is mandatory for my sign-in process:
This field is undocumented but it looks likes it stores the time of the first successful authentification. Am I right? If so, the choice of the name emailVerificationTime is maybe not the best because it can be confusing along with an email_verified field set to false. Anyway, could you add a bit of documentation about that mysterious emailVerificationTime? Thanks for your nice product!
Hi, I’m evaluating Convex to migrate a Firebase app.
IMHO, unless your main target are developers, Google OAuth is much more useful to users than the already well documented GitHub OAuth.
The official Google OAuth example does not provide details about the actual Google profile fields we can get. To make it work, I had to go to Google OAuth docs to select the
sub
field as my ID. I also added theemail_verified
field that is mandatory for my sign-in process:auth.js
I was surprised to see that an
emailVerificationTime
was automagically created in my users table. I had to add it to my schema:schema.ts
This field is undocumented but it looks likes it stores the time of the first successful authentification. Am I right? If so, the choice of the name
emailVerificationTime
is maybe not the best because it can be confusing along with anemail_verified
field set tofalse
. Anyway, could you add a bit of documentation about that mysteriousemailVerificationTime
? Thanks for your nice product!Somewhat related to #83.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: