Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fine Chloride (SALACL) output is highly underestimated #2720

Open
ankitpatel0698 opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Fine Chloride (SALACL) output is highly underestimated #2720

ankitpatel0698 opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
category: Question Further information is requested help needed: Open Research Problem An issue that is a matter of open scientific research rather than a code issue. help needed: Request Input From Community We need GC community to provide a fix/update

Comments

@ankitpatel0698
Copy link

Your name

Ankit

Your affiliation

IITM

Please provide a clear and concise description of your question or discussion topic.

Dear Geos-Chem Community
I am running a GEOS-Chem simulation over the nested Indian region and observing extremely low fine chloride concentrations compared to measurements. I am using GT-Chlorine emissions, which provide anthropogenic HCl emissions. Interestingly, the model output over a Chinese city aligns well with observations without any scaling, but over India, the predicted fine chloride levels are significantly lower than observed values. Initially, I suspected that the emissions over India might be underestimated, so I applied different scale factors. At around a 10x scale factor, the model output becomes somewhat comparable to observations. However, increasing emissions by 10 times seems highly unrealistic, which raises concerns about potential issues elsewhere in the model setup. I am trying to understand whether I am making an error in my approach, whether the applied scale factors are reasonable, or if there could be another factor affecting the fine chloride concentrations in my simulation.
Has anyone encountered a similar issue or has insights into what might be causing this discrepancy?
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

following is the model vs observation in my simulation
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YkUf6RgWt5uEZwj70gN3USDwKWWGg7K_/view?usp=drive_link

Following is a study where same emission inventory is used for comparison over China (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c05037)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U82VYD6Gj-OgYkO0eDogQH_sLXYTlgDA/view?usp=drive_link

HEMCO_Config file
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QVpVM7HbPjrUt-f6vgwQZNakWVYUcCJS/view?usp=drive_link

Thanks in advance

@ankitpatel0698 ankitpatel0698 added the category: Question Further information is requested label Feb 10, 2025
@yantosca yantosca added help needed: Open Research Problem An issue that is a matter of open scientific research rather than a code issue. help needed: Request Input From Community We need GC community to provide a fix/update labels Feb 10, 2025
@yantosca
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for writing @ankitpatel0698. This is more of a science question and as such would be better posed to the Aerosols WG. Tagging @beckyalexander @theloniuspunk @wporter

@yantosca
Copy link
Contributor

You can also email the Aerosols WG email list: geos-chem-aerosols [at] g.harvard.edu

@yantosca yantosca self-assigned this Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: Question Further information is requested help needed: Open Research Problem An issue that is a matter of open scientific research rather than a code issue. help needed: Request Input From Community We need GC community to provide a fix/update
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants