Skip to content

Move core arrays and builders into geoarrow-array subcrate? #1017

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
kylebarron opened this issue Apr 3, 2025 · 0 comments
Closed

Move core arrays and builders into geoarrow-array subcrate? #1017

kylebarron opened this issue Apr 3, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@kylebarron
Copy link
Member

There's too much complexity in geoarrow-rs and it's making it hard to make progress.

I think a great way forward might be to identify pieces of geoarrow that are stable enough to be their own sub-crate and manage that refactor. E.g. in #1015 we added a geoarrow-schema crate, because the core types should be stable enough to be in a standalone crate.

I think the core array types and builders are (relatively) stable (not the indexed arrays, not the chunked arrays). Maybe those core array types should go into a geoarrow-array to mimic arrow-array?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant