You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's too much complexity in geoarrow-rs and it's making it hard to make progress.
I think a great way forward might be to identify pieces of geoarrow that are stable enough to be their own sub-crate and manage that refactor. E.g. in #1015 we added a geoarrow-schema crate, because the core types should be stable enough to be in a standalone crate.
I think the core array types and builders are (relatively) stable (not the indexed arrays, not the chunked arrays). Maybe those core array types should go into a geoarrow-array to mimic arrow-array?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's too much complexity in geoarrow-rs and it's making it hard to make progress.
I think a great way forward might be to identify pieces of geoarrow that are stable enough to be their own sub-crate and manage that refactor. E.g. in #1015 we added a geoarrow-schema crate, because the core types should be stable enough to be in a standalone crate.
I think the core array types and builders are (relatively) stable (not the indexed arrays, not the chunked arrays). Maybe those core array types should go into a
geoarrow-array
to mimicarrow-array
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: