Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

serving YSE data for known AGN #159

Open
djones1040 opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

serving YSE data for known AGN #159

djones1040 opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@djones1040
Copy link
Collaborator

YSE data for known AGN could be served as a CSV file where it can be ingested into YSE-PZ and vetted by our team.

@genghisken
Copy link
Owner

I'll try and get this going within the next week (by 24th June).

@genghisken
Copy link
Owner

genghisken commented Jul 6, 2020

At the moment AGNs are ditched, along with VS (variable stars) and BS (bright stars). Do you want me to leave the AGNs in the eyeball list so you can view them. If so, I'll modify the code so that all except AGNs are presented in the current CSVs (as currently happens) and then all the AGNs in Possible, Good and Confirmed are presented in a separate CSV. OK? Alternatively I can move the AGNs to a separate eyeball list and scanners can view it separately (with promotion to the Possible & Good lists directly from there), so that the current list isn't cluttered with AGNs. Let me know what you think.

@djones1040
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi Ken, I think the 2nd option would be great if it's not too hard. A possibly easier (though less convenient for us) alternative would be to just have a CSV for the AGNs that our team could parse internally and AGNs would not be included on the good/possible/eyeball lists at all. That's what I was suggesting above just as a quick thing, though your second suggestion is certainly easier for us. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants