You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think the ultimate graph should be the one that correlates scihub data with catalogs of libraries in every city/state. Right now we are presuming that some people do have access, and some don't, but we don't really know. Unfortunately I think that would be possible only for very few universities... (btw, your blogpost is awesome)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That would be really great, unfortunately that's really hard to do as the geographic data only goes down to city level. I discussed something similar yesterday with @philippbayer. You could try to find universities/institutions that are so remote that they basically are their own city, so no non-academics will influence the data.
I think the ultimate graph should be the one that correlates scihub data with catalogs of libraries in every city/state. Right now we are presuming that some people do have access, and some don't, but we don't really know. Unfortunately I think that would be possible only for very few universities... (btw, your blogpost is awesome)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: