Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Underestimated F090W fluxes and improper F090W kernels. #265

Open
gnoir0t opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Underestimated F090W fluxes and improper F090W kernels. #265

gnoir0t opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@gnoir0t
Copy link

gnoir0t commented Jan 15, 2025

Hi Gabe,

Reporting the F090W issue here so you can have a look and hopefully figure it out.
When extracting and fitting data in the Technicolor fields with grizli, we noticed a systematic flux drop in F090W, creating artificial breaks especially noticeable for brighter sources (see attached image).
We noticed that the F090W inverse sensitivity curves for both grisms were off, and we rescaled them (for the first order only, see attached plots).
This rescaling of the inverse sensitivity curves (NIRISS.GR150C.F090W.p1.etc.sens.fits and NIRISS.GR150R.F090W.p1.etc.sens.fits) made only a little improvement and the flux drop/underestimation largely remains (see plot).

Also, this might be unrelated, but the F090W kernels seem screwed up (see plot).

1
2
3
4
5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant