Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reference GRSciColl when relevant #105

Open
CecSve opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Reference GRSciColl when relevant #105

CecSve opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Data Publishing Issues relating to enhancing the 'Data Publishing' section of the technical documentation GRSciColl Documentation relating to the Global Registry of Scientific Collections System Components Issues relating to enhancing the 'System Components' section of the technical documentation

Comments

@CecSve
Copy link
Contributor

CecSve commented Oct 22, 2024

It would be good to link to GRSciColl in the metadata-only dataset class section and explain which data is best shared where, for example, some data might be better shared as collection descriptors than mentioned in a metadata-only dataset. However, data discoverability should also be highlighted in this context.

@CecSve CecSve added Data Publishing Issues relating to enhancing the 'Data Publishing' section of the technical documentation System Components Issues relating to enhancing the 'System Components' section of the technical documentation labels Oct 22, 2024
@ManonGros ManonGros added the GRSciColl Documentation relating to the Global Registry of Scientific Collections label Oct 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Data Publishing Issues relating to enhancing the 'Data Publishing' section of the technical documentation GRSciColl Documentation relating to the Global Registry of Scientific Collections System Components Issues relating to enhancing the 'System Components' section of the technical documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants