-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
apiserverproxy: introduce self managed network interface #10575
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
move from loopback device to a self managed interface Signed-off-by: Lukas Hoehl <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Hoehl <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hi @hown3d. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a gardener member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/hold wait for apiserver-proxy v0.18.0 release |
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ func (a *apiserverProxy) computeResourcesData() (map[string][]byte, error) { | |||
ImagePullPolicy: corev1.PullIfNotPresent, | |||
Args: []string{ | |||
fmt.Sprintf("--ip-address=%s", a.values.advertiseIPAddress), | |||
"--interface=lo", | |||
"--interface=apiserverproxy0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As we don't run with --cleanup=true
the address on the loopback device will not be deleted. Do we need to roll this out in two steps? First enable cleanup and set the interface with the next release?
https://github.com/gardener/apiserver-proxy/blob/5c0731a4a9c96d2ebdd97ddb3b68e1e21c8a8761/cmd/apiserver-proxy-sidecar/main.go#L29
The Gardener project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
You can:
/lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Gardener project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
You can:
/lifecycle stale |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
How to categorize this PR?
/area networking
/kind enhancement
What this PR does / why we need it:
gardener/apiserver-proxy#138 and gardener/apiserver-proxy#125 introduced changes to the apiserver-proxy component to manage it's own network interface to move away from loopback device
lo
Reason is cilium ignoring the lo device when considering host addresses in eBPF datapath mode:
See gardener/gardener-extension-networking-cilium#386 for additional information.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes gardener/gardener-extension-networking-cilium#386
Special notes for your reviewer:
During testing with the local setup the rollout of the new network interface did not interfere existing connections.
Having the address bind to loopback and the new device did not raise any issues.
Cleanup is done when a node roll occurs anyway.