Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Leverage gRPC external cloud provider instead of forking and maintaining upstream repository #172

Open
unmarshall opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/icebox Temporarily on hold (will not age; may have dependencies, lack priority, miss feedback, etc.) lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage)

Comments

@unmarshall
Copy link

What would you like to be added:
Upstream cluster-autoscaler provides a way for custom cloud providers to plug in (out-of-tree) to CA via gRPC external cloud provider. We should do a POC to learn on how to get this setup done, to also learn its issues/short comings and in the end to take a decision on whether this would be a feasible solution for MCM as a cloud provider.

Why is this needed:
Eliminates the need to maintain a fork of the upstream cluster-autoscaler repo. We can even think of moving this MCM cloud provider as part of the MCM pod. Ideally we should just have 2 containers in the MCM pod:

  1. MCM core + MCM provider extension into one container
  2. Side car: which provides the custom cloud provider for cluster-autoscaler.
@unmarshall unmarshall added the kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension label Feb 14, 2023
@himanshu-kun himanshu-kun added lifecycle/icebox Temporarily on hold (will not age; may have dependencies, lack priority, miss feedback, etc.) important-soon and removed important-soon labels Mar 1, 2023
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) label Nov 8, 2023
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) and removed lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) labels Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/icebox Temporarily on hold (will not age; may have dependencies, lack priority, miss feedback, etc.) lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants