You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In nodeOperatorHaloAngularMomentumVitvitska2002, darkMatterProfileScaleRadiusJohnson2021, and nodeOperatorHaloAxisRatiosMenkerBenson2022 we do not account for possible subsampling of halos. It should be possible to include the subsampling weights into the calculation. In principle we should then also account for these when computing the unresolved mass accretion - although this could lead to negative unresolved mass (which is maybe ok numerically?).
It would also be good to set up correct calibration of the subresolution behavior to ensure converged results. This could be done by requiring internal self-consistency - i.e. the distributions of concentration, spin, shape, etc. should not change as the resolution of altered. (This could be checked with/without subsampling.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In
nodeOperatorHaloAngularMomentumVitvitska2002
,darkMatterProfileScaleRadiusJohnson2021
, andnodeOperatorHaloAxisRatiosMenkerBenson2022
we do not account for possible subsampling of halos. It should be possible to include the subsampling weights into the calculation. In principle we should then also account for these when computing the unresolved mass accretion - although this could lead to negative unresolved mass (which is maybe ok numerically?).It would also be good to set up correct calibration of the subresolution behavior to ensure converged results. This could be done by requiring internal self-consistency - i.e. the distributions of concentration, spin, shape, etc. should not change as the resolution of altered. (This could be checked with/without subsampling.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: