You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
pg 122: IF THE WEAPON HAS SEVERAL DAMAGE DICE, YOU CAN DIVIDE THE DICE AMONG SEVERAL CLOSE TARGETS.
Assuming that this also mean separate to-hit rolls? (Could add an editable field for damage vs. this target to allow down-sizing roll, or something.) Although in the existing implementation, multiple attack rolls would also mean multiple ammo deductions, which isn't incorrect. Hrm.
Could also just leave single attack roll, and let players/GM manually split the damage dice themselves. However, we're not showing the separate roll.terms.results of "2d4". Maybe we can leverage the click-to-expand features of the default roll chat message?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Pretty sure it's not meant to be multiple attack rolls (keep in mind rolls are risky in DiS), but completely agree with the suggestion. Ability to click the damage field in the chat card and see the actual rolls (like in dnd5e) would be great.
pg 122: IF THE WEAPON HAS SEVERAL DAMAGE DICE, YOU CAN DIVIDE THE DICE AMONG SEVERAL CLOSE TARGETS.
Assuming that this also mean separate to-hit rolls? (Could add an editable field for damage vs. this target to allow down-sizing roll, or something.) Although in the existing implementation, multiple attack rolls would also mean multiple ammo deductions, which isn't incorrect. Hrm.
Could also just leave single attack roll, and let players/GM manually split the damage dice themselves. However, we're not showing the separate roll.terms.results of "2d4". Maybe we can leverage the click-to-expand features of the default roll chat message?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: