Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SAP6 feedback - physical attributes #28

Open
mlubej opened this issue Jul 12, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

SAP6 feedback - physical attributes #28

mlubej opened this issue Jul 12, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@mlubej
Copy link

mlubej commented Jul 12, 2024

Hi @furbrain!

At our local caving club we have received the SAP6 and have already field-tested it. There were some changes in measurements compared to the Disto-X2, but the Disto-X2 was not calibrated, so we have to repeat this test. Otherwise the calibration process of the SAP6 is really simple and the device is intuitive enough. We may change the interface and button usage a bit to fit more to our needs. If there are any generic updates or bugfixes, we will prepare a PR.

There were a few weird crashes which we cannot reproduce yet, but we'll try it out more. We even have all the electrical components now to try to make our own (except for the battery, because we'd like your input from #27 first)

One comment from our side is that the 3D prints seem a bit bad, and for a purchased item such as this we would have expected better quality prints. Perhaps your 3D printer is not calibrated well.

The print seems to be warped at the base and at the screen part

20240628_155805 20240628_155948

and the cap has some holes in the layers, which is a sign of under-extrusion

20240628_155752

Additional comment regarding the glass layer: is there a way that we could protect this? did you have any ideas in the past already? If you agree that it would be a good idea, I can design a TPU "cap" with a hole which would fit on the glass part. Accepting also other ideas

20240628_160037

Will continue testing and giving feedback, thanks!

@mlubej
Copy link
Author

mlubej commented Jul 12, 2024

BTW, I see that you used ABS for the prints, which is famous for warp issues on the print bed. IMO ABS is best for situations where high-temperature resistance is needed, but if that is not a requirement, PET-G is equally good, since it's still very robust and much easier to print. Do you think it would be a suitable replacement to ABS in this product?

@furbrain
Copy link
Owner

furbrain commented Jul 12, 2024 via email

@furbrain
Copy link
Owner

furbrain commented Jul 12, 2024 via email

@furbrain
Copy link
Owner

furbrain commented Jul 12, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants