We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I am trying to call UMI consensus using
fgbio -XX:-UseGCOverheadLimit -Xms750m -Xmx8g --tmp-dir=/tmpfs CallMolecularConsensusReads --min-reads=1 --min-input-base-quality=0 --max-reads=1000000 --output-per-base-tags=true --sort-order=:none: --debug=true --input=/dev/stdin --output=${output_bam} --rejects=${output_rejects} 2> ${log}
However, a large number of reads get filtered out "due to orphan consensus created".
[2024/11/22 15:59:21 | CallMolecularConsensusReads | Info] Total Raw Reads Considered: 8,314,392. [2024/11/22 15:59:21 | CallMolecularConsensusReads | Info] Raw Reads Filtered Due to Orphan Consensus Created: 2,356,267 (0.2834). [2024/11/22 15:59:21 | CallMolecularConsensusReads | Info] Raw Reads Filtered Due to Mismatching Cigars: 27,582 (0.0033). [2024/11/22 15:59:21 | CallMolecularConsensusReads | Info] Raw Reads Filtered Due to Insufficient Support: 0 (0.0000). [2024/11/22 15:59:21 | CallMolecularConsensusReads | Info] Consensus reads emitted: 1,906,142.
Previous steps included creation of MI tags and sorting by TemplateCoordinate as usual.
I'm not sure I get what is going on here. What could be the reason for this, and how exactly is "orphan consensus"defined?
Thanks :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I am trying to call UMI consensus using
However, a large number of reads get filtered out "due to orphan consensus created".
Previous steps included creation of MI tags and sorting by TemplateCoordinate as usual.
I'm not sure I get what is going on here. What could be the reason for this, and how exactly is "orphan consensus"defined?
Thanks :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: