-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add PTAB, TTAB, and ITC decisions #4
Comments
Selected cases from all 3 of these bodies are published in a Bloomberg/BNA reporter called U.S.P.Q. (now U.S.P.Q.2d). I can fill people in on the TTAB. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Patents_Quarterly?wprov=sfti1#See_also |
Got an email related to this today:
I asked them how much this was worth to them. I added a new discussion to think about extracting patent numbers: #43 |
Given all the talk about tariffs lately, we may want to bump USITC ahead in the roadmap. Tariff and dumping cases are within their ambit—not just IP cases.
They publish a list of active import injury investigations. The patent people are interested in their other adjudication area, which is unfair imports (Section 337). These investigations can be about any form of IP (not only patents) or antitrust. The goal is to get an exclusion order preventing the import of offending goods. The USITC's cases (they call them "investigations") and documents are available through an online system called EDIS that has both RSS feeds and an XML-y API. This body is different enough that it's probably worth dividing any work from the USPTO's PTAB and TTAB. That said, it will be valuable if we can connect USTIC, PTAB/TTAB, and District Court cases to each other and to the underlying IP rights. Sometimes patents especially are being litigated in two or three of these places simultaneously, and a body will stay their case while the another finishes its work. |
Headline
Free Law Project adds [huge-number] of decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and International Trade Commission (USITC)
What is the Feature?
This would add patent related litigation to our case law database and would keep it up to date with ongoing data collection.
This is a slight divergence from our current practice of collecting almost exclusively 3rd branch content, but we do collect Attorney General decisions now, so it's not crazy.
This could fit into our jurisdiction picker in the "More" tab, where we have Military, Tribal, Historical, and Misc. courts:
What Problem Might it Solve?
This would further round out our collection of data.
Describe a Scenario in Which the Feature Might be Used
One user reports:
For attorneys like this, these decisions could be useful.
Technical Requirements
What would it require that we do technically?
This would require a new scraper for ongoing and historical updates and some minor changes in the UI. It could involve adding new fields to the DB, which would add some complexity.
How hard is it to make, subjectively? Medium. I don't think there are that many cases, and the scrapers shouldn't be that hard to make.
Best guess, how long would it take to make, roughly?
Three weeks.
Existing Systems or Alternatives?
More research is needed here, but so far I know Docket Alarm has this, and I believe you can search the gov't website as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: