Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC9083 (rdapConformance "rdap_level_0"), annotation No. 4 #7

Open
danielmarschall opened this issue Sep 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

RFC9083 (rdapConformance "rdap_level_0"), annotation No. 4 #7

danielmarschall opened this issue Sep 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@danielmarschall
Labels
doublecheck-request Internal request for double check

Comments

@danielmarschall
Copy link
Collaborator

( GitHub issue #1 of 21 Jul 2022 split into single issues )

Anmerkungen und Defekte/Abweichungen in RDAP-Implementierung gem. RFC9083 (rdapConformance rdap_level_0):

  • (verletzt RFC Abschnitt 2.1) Felder, die von uns definiert werden (nicht im RFC 9083) stehen, sollen einen Präfix bekommen z.B. "oidplus_" oder "frdl_".
@danielmarschall danielmarschall mentioned this issue Sep 9, 2022
Closed
@wehowski
Copy link
Member

wehowski commented Sep 9, 2022

Bitte auch nochmal gegegenprüfen:

@wehowski wehowski mentioned this issue Sep 9, 2022
Closed
@danielmarschall danielmarschall self-assigned this Sep 11, 2022
@danielmarschall danielmarschall added the doublecheck-request Internal request for double check label Sep 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@danielmarschall danielmarschall

Labels
doublecheck-request Internal request for double check
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wehowski @danielmarschall