Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multigroup models should have their own type #80

Closed
Maximilian-Stefan-Ernst opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Multigroup models should have their own type #80

Maximilian-Stefan-Ernst opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Milestone

Comments

@Maximilian-Stefan-Ernst
Copy link
Collaborator

The documentation of the CFA Taxon says

n_sample: Number of observed cases. May be between different taxons from same paper sometime, e.g. multigroup models.

However, I believe Multigroup models should be their own Taxon to preserve the information that those models are indeed Multigroup models. In this case, we need to label the parameters to indicate their restrictions across groups.

@aaronpeikert aaronpeikert added the good first issue Good for newcomers label May 3, 2023
@aaronpeikert aaronpeikert added this to the CFA Ready milestone May 3, 2023
@aaronpeikert
Copy link
Contributor

We should create a very simple wrapper type that simply contains a vector of taxons.

@aaronpeikert
Copy link
Contributor

is on the roadmap

@aaronpeikert aaronpeikert closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants