Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Developing a system for benchmarking #304

Open
TomDonoghue opened this issue Sep 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Developing a system for benchmarking #304

TomDonoghue opened this issue Sep 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
>2.0 Idea for beyond specparam 2.0.

Comments

@TomDonoghue
Copy link
Member

There has been some discussion of developing more of a consistent setup / approach for profiling the module / models, and using this as we go forward.

Recent optimizations (#299) spurred this discussion including the following comment (to keep in mind) about further work on benchmarking: #299 (comment)

For some basic record keeping, in terms of model fitting, we currently spend basically all of our time in curve_fit, with there not being much obvious opportunity to speed things up beyond what was already done in #299. See this comment (#299 (comment)) for some comments on potentially exploring different fitting approaches.

In terms of some basic / benchmarking sims / tests, there are some starting points:

I think the general idea would be to develop anything like this with or after the 2.0 release - so for now we can use this issue for any further discussion, and keep this in mind as we move towards 2.0 and beyond.

@TomDonoghue TomDonoghue added the >2.0 Idea for beyond specparam 2.0. label Sep 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>2.0 Idea for beyond specparam 2.0.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant