Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

In text-to-lexeme, show sense link #155

Open
Ainali opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

In text-to-lexeme, show sense link #155

Ainali opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@Ainali
Copy link

Ainali commented Feb 8, 2023

For a sense, it is very useful to quickly know if it already is connected to other concepts or lexemes. Primarily, these properties are of interest (and usually, only one of them are present on each sense):

If they are lacking, it might also be interesting to know if any of these properties are present (but perhaps that should be covered by another issue):

@dpriskorn
Copy link

Is the purpose of this to analyze a text and see if all words found make sense somehow in the graph?

@Ainali
Copy link
Author

Ainali commented Feb 10, 2023

Yes, my purpose is to paste short Wikipedia articles to see if they are theoretically possible to generate with lexemes. That is, to see if there is enough information about the lexemes that generators would be able to find them. For that, a concept link is important, but, for example, a sense image is not.

@dpriskorn
Copy link

dpriskorn commented Feb 13, 2023

So a new column with a title like this Has item for this sense (P5137), predicate for (P9970), demonym of (P6271) or pertainym of (P8471) with the value true/false for each word would be enough for your purposes?

@dpriskorn
Copy link

Perhaps a column for each of those properties is more valuable to you so you see the values also?

@Ainali
Copy link
Author

Ainali commented Feb 13, 2023

A column each would, of course, be the most clear thing.

However, since it is very unlikely that there is more than one of these as statements, I could also envision just one column titled "concept linked with" containing as values the name of the property linked to that statement or a blank if there was nothing. (This could save a lot of space.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants